100 league sections 2009/10

100 ball group stage 1 to qualify from each group. games to be played Thurday 22 October 09 / Thurday 3 December 09 / Thurday 21 January 10 / the Semi-final and final to be played 25 April 10.

Section 1
Railway Tavern
Sunbeam
Bayview Bar
Douglas Arms

Section 2
Buck'n'Hynd
Auld Hoose
Silver Tassie
Blazers

Section 3
Brig Tavern
Argyle Bar
Central
Empire Bar

Section 4
Den Inn
Kirkland Bar
Windsor
Maxwells

Buck'n'Hynd
Auld Hoose
Silver Tassie
Blazers

looking at section 2 of the 100 ball it has 3 of the top 4 teams from last season maybe their should have been a ranking system involved to make the other groups more competative. i think a team like the buck would have stood more of a chance to qualify if they had 1 of the 3 and 2 other teams say empire or railway.

in the jathros draw we had all the players that qualified for last seasons quarters as the 8 seeds so out of the 4 secions only 2 seeds could be together, pointless bringing up new ideas at meetings as they dont stand a chance of being voted in and everything goes over the head of the chaps that turn up for these meeting (captains)

prediction
section a - Douglas
section b - Tassie
section c - Brig
section d - Den Inn

i have entered the latest scores of the 1st round in the score and table section
the up and coming fixtures may be wrong. they can be changed later

http://levenmouth.leaguerepublic.com/Index.do;jsessionid=175516DB09E6C0C4984ED00DC7EC48DB?selectedSeason=4728887&selectedDivision=9087597

blazers have the buck'n'hynd for the second year in a row
blazers won in the buck'n'hynd last year 100-59 but as the score versus the 3 teams in the group was not good enough we were nocked out after the league was completed.

blazers playing buck'n'hynd, there player did not have a pot so played to hit a pale but miss hit and fould so as blazers thought they could move the white to the dee but didnt want 2 shots the rule for making a foul is minus 3 points.
the rule was you were allowed to move it, maybe it has changed, the rule was discussed before a year or so ago / baldy pointing it out, check this foram below for information
https://levenmouthpoolleague.forumotion.com/new-forum-pool-f3/pool-rules-t24.htm

anyway blazers won the game 100 - 76 in the end

Tassie bt the AHW last night, think the score was about 100-90.

Maybe it was an inappropriate time to point out: at the start of an AHW break with score at 85 -99 (but a very crucial time to check that the balls had been set up correctly) but the black spot was too far forward by about 3/4 inch. Thought the rack had been placed incorrectly but upon checking, the black was on the spot.

Don't think the AHW were too chuffed about me pointing it out (Think it was a gimp Skins called me!, What a nice chap!) but that was the first of me checking it. Anyway they broke with the black in that position all the same and potted off the break so it had no bearing on the result that we won. Was a good fair game that could have gone either way.

Checked the Tassie table when we got back and it's sitting too far forward too. Maybe whoever's setting up the tables is getting it wrong?

Info from the rules about the spot
"The cloth will be marked with a "Spot" at the position where a straight line drawn diagonally from the centre of a side pocket to the centre of a corner pocket would intersect with a straight line drawn from the centre of the opposite side pocket to the centre of the other corner pocket."

now now baldy skins is a very nice chap. aw the same pal thats a great gimp mask.

terry wrote:now now baldy skins is a very nice chap. aw the same pal thats a great gimp mask.

lol never thought of that i thought it was a mask for winter lol

anyways it looks like a 3 way play off for to find the winners of this league.
if blazers loss then i will be on games won and lost between the teams if tassie beat the buck ,

section b updated after week 2
http://levenmouth.leaguerepublic.com/ProcessPublicSelect.do?psSelectedSeason=4728887&psSelectedDivision=4365668&psSelectedLeague=7559313

looking at the table blazers will need to win at auld hoose , tassie play the buck and should win by at least 30 odd points to win the group if blazers loss
if auld hoose win they need to win by 12 odd points to take over blazers but they still have to score more than the tassie.

its a close 1-2 call but we r away 2 the ahw n a think that givs us the edge. we coodni pot a thing last nite. we r a lot better away fi home in the 100 baw mon the blazers. by the way do u hav the suit 2 go wi the mask

Douglas 100 Railway 86

Was a disaster from the start as the Railway came in moaning and moaned all night apparantly

Would not play with red balls on a red cloth, balls changed to yellow and blue

Railway had about 12 men in the pub at the start

We have 9, Chico writes down the 9 men, hands sheet to Railway, Railway bring it back with only 8 names on their side and said that they were only playing with 8

So as I was down as 9th I got bombed out and could play

So off I went out the pub and away

Glad they got their just deserves in the end

Well done the Douglas

i cant believe as a team player you managed to go all the way to methilhill and didnt stay to see the game, we had 10 players versus the buck ,i was 1 of the subs but i stayed to watch the game

STOO01 wrote:i cant believe as a team player you managed to go all the way to methilhill and didnt stay to see the game, we had 10 players versus the buck ,i was 1 of the subs but i stayed to watch the game

Did u start work at 3.45am this morning though

works got nowt 2 do with pool ur either there or ur no. its called dedication a think just kiddin wot u doin up at 3-45 u gon snow droppin

Stoo

Maxwells beat Den Inn by 100 - 87

peterloon wrote:Stoo

Maxwells beat Den Inn by 100 - 87

thats a good win for you boys i'll update the site, cheers


so there's only 3 games i need the results for does anyone know the exact scores
Sunbeam v Bayview /A - beam won

Argyle v Central /C - argyle won

Kirkland v Windsor /D - windsor won

or the results should be in the mail on wednesday

Baldy wrote:Tassie bt the AHW last night, think the score was about 100-90.

Maybe it was an inappropriate time to point out: at the start of an AHW break with score at 85 -99 (but a very crucial time to check that the balls had been set up correctly) but the black spot was too far forward by about 3/4 inch. Thought the rack had been placed incorrectly but upon checking, the black was on the spot.

Don't think the AHW were too chuffed about me pointing it out (Think it was a gimp Skins called me!, What a nice chap!) but that was the first of me checking it. Anyway they broke with the black in that position all the same and potted off the break so it had no bearing on the result that we won. Was a good fair game that could have gone either way.

Checked the Tassie table when we got back and it's sitting too far forward too. Maybe whoever's setting up the tables is getting it wrong?

Info from the rules about the spot
"The cloth will be marked with a "Spot" at the position where a straight line drawn diagonally from the centre of a side pocket to the centre of a corner pocket would intersect with a straight line drawn from the centre of the opposite side pocket to the centre of the other corner pocket."

your right to make sure the balls are set up correct, skins is upset about loasing he text me about playing me for money and im pish what does that say about the guy i beat, i may be pish but 9-2 isni close , ya losser and spencer beat him 5-1

terry wrote:works got nowt 2 do with pool ur either there or ur no. its called dedication a think just kiddin wot u doin up at 3-45 u gon snow droppin

Try up at 2.45am to start at 3.45am

try posting information about pool this is a pool website no nothing to do wi anybodys work time table

STOO01 wrote:try posting information about pool this is a pool website no nothing to do wi anybodys work time table

in the group stages if a team gets a 100-0 victory because a team fails to turn up or as a team to play with .

this is unfair on the other 2 teams that may have to play all 3 games.

if you win 100-0 and the second match the team that failed to turn up has a team put loses and get say 80 odds then thats an disadvantage for the other teams

if at the end of the league a team fails to play 1 match then all there fixtures should be void and the table made up of the matches played between the 3 teams left

Stoo surely this situation is in the rules as at the start of the season.

Or is that too logical a thought?

peterloon wrote:Stoo surely this situation is in the rules as at the start of the season.

Or is that too logical a thought?

it is a rule but i thought that it was wrong for some teams in this situation

if 2 team ends on the same points then it goes to balls potted and lost, but if your up against a team that has won 100-0 because they never played against a team that failed to turn up, your up against it

It would be fairer, surely, if ties are decided by head-to-head scores between the teams concerned.

It sems there is a problem with the totals in the mail and what we have on the web site ,all the scores were taken from the mail scores , only the scores for the auld hoose and silver tassie are wrong.

POS P W L F A DIFF PTS
1 Blazers 2 2 0 200 163 37 6
2 Silver Tassie 2 1 1 187 184 3 3
2 Tassie East fife mail for 187 against 192

3 Auld Hoose fife mail for 192 against 171
3 Auld Hoose W 2 1 1 184 171 13 3
4 Buck'n'Hynd 2 0 2 147 200 -53 0

blazers need to win to qualify for the final, if auld hoose win then they must have a better points difference than the silver tassie and blazers . it looks like tassie have 8 points less, auld hoose have 8 points more.
not saying its defo wrong but in the mail they bid have the leage table for the league wrong for months

Auld Hoose Windygates phoned in the score on the night. They phoned in 100 84 which is what is on the pool website.
Mark Brodie came to our game last week because The Auld Hoose later told him they phoned in the wrong score and they should have phoned in 100 92.

However, neither of these scores is correct. We were winning 99 85 when the last rack was set up, Their player scored at the very most 4 or 5 balls then missed. We then potted the 100th ball. All our team remember it this way.

The score was therfore 100 89 or 100 90 at the most (See my earlier post on the match with score as about 100 90). It probably wont matter tomorrow but if it does come down to a couple of balls to see who qualifies, there'll be a big argument as we told Mark this info last week but he didn't want to have to go back to the AHW and tell them. He's obviously went with what they told him and had that printed in the EFM.

Poor show Mr Chairman!!!